< Previous | Contents | Manuals Home | Boris FX | Next >
โHow NOT to Stabilize
Though it is relatively easy to rig up a node-based compositor to shift footage back and forth to cancel out a tracked motion, this creates a fundamental problem:
Most imaging software, including you, expects the optic center of an image to fall at the center of that image. Otherwise, it looks weirdโthe fundamental camera geometry is broken. The optic center might also be called the vanishing point, center of perspective, back focal point, center of lens distortion.
For example, think of shooting some footage out of the front of your car as you drive down a highway. Now cut off the right quarter of all the images and look at the sequence. It will be 4:3 footage, but itโs going to look strangeโthe optic center is going to be off to the side.
If you combine off-center footage with additional rendered elements, they will have the optic axis at their center, and combined with the different center of the original footage, they will look even worse.
So when you stabilize by translating an image in 2-D (and usually zooming a little), youโve now got an optic center moving all over the place. Right at the point youโve stabilized, the image looks fine, but the corners will be flying all over the place. Itโs a very strange effect, it looks funny, and you canโt track it right. If you donโt know what it is, youโll look at it, and think it looks funny but not know what has hit you.
Recommendation: if you are going to be adding effects to a shot, you should ask to be the one to stabilize or pan/scan it also. Weโve given you the tool to do it well, and avoid mishap. Thatโs always better than having someone else mangle it, and having to explain later why the shot has problems, or why you really need the original un-stabilized source by yesterday.
ยฉ2025 Boris FX, Inc.ย โย UNOFFICIALย โย Converted from original PDF.
